The Son of Kong

    The Son of Kong
    1933

    Synopsis

    Beleaguered adventurer Carl Denham returns to the island where he found King Kong.

    Your Movie Library

    Cast

    • Robert ArmstrongCarl Denham
    • Helen MackHilda Peterson
    • Frank ReicherCaptain Englehorn
    • John MarstonCaptain Nils Helstrom
    • Victor WongCharlie the Cook
    • Ed BradyBo'sun Red
    • Steve ClementeNative Witch King (uncredited)
    • Noble JohnsonNative Chief (uncredited)
    • Lee KohlmarMickey the 2nd Process Server (uncredited)
    • Gertrude ShortPersistent Reporter (uncredited)

    Recommendations

    • 75

      TV Guide Magazine

      A funny, entertaining little film that pales in comparison with the original, but has enough value in its own right.
    • 60

      Time Out

      The film was rushed out to capitalise on its predecessor, with none of the subtext, but the animation is up to scratch, the action and direction efficient, and there is a nice melancholy to Denham’s regret for his previous conduct, which aptly prolongs the mournfulness of the original’s ending.
    • 60

      The New York Times

      This sequel to last season's hair-raiser is a low melodrama with a number of laughs that are loud and satisfying, although the comical intent of the producers is open to argument.
    • 50

      Chicago Reader

      Ernest Schoedsack's sequel to his monster hit of 1933, rushed out the same year. The slapdash production shows in a wavering tone and a paucity of special effects. With Robert Armstrong and Helen Mack; the animation, what there is of it, is by the legendary Willis O'Brien.
    • 50

      Variety

      This is the sequel to and wash-up of the King Kong theme, consisting of salvaged remnants from the original production and rating as fair entertainment.
    • 40

      The New York Times

      The film does offer some witty opening scenes depicting Carl Denham hounded by creditors following Kong's Gotham rampage. But the remainder of the film is sometimes laughably bad, and much of the dialogue is dated in a way that is not charming at all. [20 Sept 1987, p.36]

    Seen by

    • Shlomo_Goldstein