The Boys in Company C

    The Boys in Company C
    1978

    Synopsis

    Disheartened by futile combat, appalled by the corruption of their South Vietnamese ally, and constantly endangered by the incompetence of their own company commander, the young men find a possible way out of the war. They are told that if they purposely lose a soccer game against a South Vietnamese team, they can spend the rest of their tour playing exhibition games behind the lines.

    Your Movie Library

    Cast

    • Stan ShawPfc / Sgt. Tyrone Washington
    • Andrew StevensPvt. Billy Ray Pike
    • James CanningPvt. Alvin Foster / Narrator
    • Michael LembeckPvt. Vinnie Fazio
    • Craig WassonPvt. Dave Bisbee
    • Scott HylandsCapt. Collins
    • James Whitmore Jr.Lt. Archer
    • Helen McNeelyHead Nurse
    • Noble WillinghamSergeant Curry
    • R. Lee ErmeySergeant Loyce

    Recommendations

    • 100

      Chicago Sun-Times

      [Furie) retains the ability to make a picture move, grow on us and involve us. That’s what happens during The Boys in Company C.
    • 70

      Time Out

      Gruelling yet humorous look at a bunch of Marines through training and posting to Vietnam in 1968, this turns every war film cliché upside down: transistor radios grind out rock music over the life-and-death patrols, and the GIs behave less like soldiers than shambling tourists.
    • 60

      Variety

      The Boys in Company C is a spotty but okay popcorn trade drama about five young Marines and how their lives were changed by duty in the Vietnam war. Laden with barracks dialog and played at the enlisted man's level, the Raymond Chow production, directed well by Sidney J. Furie, features strong performances by some very fine actors.
    • 60

      The New Yorker

      The director, Sidney J. Furie, brings the film energy and he keeps the gags and the sentiment coming.
    • 60

      TV Guide Magazine

      Although it definitely falls short of The Deer Hunter or Apocalypse Now, the film is not without interest.
    • 50

      The New York Times

      As a film about heroism, it is chiefly remarkable for its gutlessness.
    • 40

      Washington Post

      The finished film has no thematic or emotional integrity. It flip-flops withdesperate hypocrisy between clownish antics and indignant orations. [09 Feb 1978, p.B13]